A private driver seizes “McLaren” and “Range Rover” from his sponsor

0
15


A businessman filed a lawsuit before the Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance, against his driver, in which he demanded to prove his ownership of a 2018 McLaren car, whose purchase price is 1,358,741 dirhams, and a Range Rover car, whose purchase price is 568 thousand dirhams, and the cancellation of the registration The two vehicles are on the name of the defendant and registered in the name of the complainant.

A businessman filed a lawsuit before the Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance, against his driver, in which he demanded to prove his ownership of a 2018 McLaren car, whose purchase price is 1,358,741 dirhams, and a Range Rover car, whose purchase price is 568 thousand dirhams, and the cancellation of the registration The two vehicles are on the name of the defendant and registered in the name of the complainant.

Explaining his claim, he said that he is a businessman who loves to own luxury cars, and due to the existence of a decision prohibiting the registration of new vehicles in the event that the customer owns expired, non-renewed vehicles, he asked the defendant, who works for him as a driver, to register the two vehicles in his name until the renewal and insurance And the licenses of his expired cars are Ferrari and McLaren P1.

obligation

He added, the defendant pledged to re-register the vehicle to him after completing the registration and insurance procedures, and in view of the trust between them, and the fact that the defendant works for him, he registered the two vehicles in his name.

He continued, “After my return from travel, I asked the defendant to transfer the ownership of the two vehicles to my name, but the defendant refused and refused without justification, while the defendant submitted a reply memorandum in which he ended up rejecting the original lawsuit for lack of validity and proof, with obligating him to pay expenses and in return for attorney’s fees.”

While the report of the engineering expert specializing in cars, delegated by the court, showed that the two vehicles in question had been purchased by the complainant and paid their value, and in June 2019 he had relinquished them in favor of the defendant, and that the first vehicle had been ceded by the defendant to another person, while the second vehicle was still under his name. However, it is in the possession of the complainant.

recording system

While the court indicated, in the rationale for its ruling, that the vehicle registration and licensing system at the relevant traffic department was not decided to prove ownership, but rather a condition for its movement on the public road and a means to determine the official who can be referred to in the event of committing a traffic violation while it is on its way.

Pointing out that what is proven in the papers and from the expert’s report is that the complainant is the one who purchased the two vehicles and their ownership was transferred in the name of the defendant.

The court clarified that the defendant joined the company owned by the complainant, and the court found that the two vehicles that he had purchased were the complainant and were registered in the name of the defendant. A McLaren model 2018, and the complainant’s request was to invalidate any act issued by the defendant that would prejudice the rights of other people of good faith, as the court decided to reject the request regarding the McLaren vehicle.

The court ruled to prove the complainant’s ownership of the Land Rover Range Rover vehicle, and to oblige the defendant to register the vehicle in the name of the complainant.

Source link for the news





LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here