America also dealt with the guilty of the Abu Ghraib prison … this is what Saudi Arabia did

0
26


His death annoyed the leadership, so it dealt with him fairly and quickly

The Saudi leadership and people believe that the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate inside Turkey was unfortunate and painful. Because it occurred to an innocent Saudi citizen as a result of mistakes committed by individuals who made efforts on their own initiative to deal with the victim without referring to their officials. The result was his death in this painful way.

Saudi Arabia also believes that the mistake of these individuals is not exclusive to Saudi Arabia. Rather, it is a mistake that can happen by any person, at any time, and in any country, big or small, but the difference between one country and another remains the mechanism for dealing with this mistake in the appropriate way to promote the right and establish justice for all citizens without exception, even if they are From the category of opponents.

Abu Ghraib prison”
The murder of Jamal Khashoggi is very close to a similar incident that occurred in the American prison inside Iraq during the American-Iraqi war, when American officers committed excesses inside this prison, which resulted in the death of a number of Iraqis, and they tortured them in brutal and degrading methods. This act was an individual act of those guilty of torture, which American officials did not know, not even the American president at the time (George Bush Jr.), but when the press brought these transgressions to American officials, they made their decision to bring the guilty to trial, and judgments were issued that helped calm world public opinion The angry, and this is exactly what Saudi leaders did in the Khashoggi incident. When the investigations proved that Khashoggi’s killing occurred as a result of the mistakes of some individuals, the rulers of the matter did not want this incident to pass without deterrent punishment for the real culprits. Saudi Arabia voluntarily brought these people to trial to obtain their punishment, in a public, frank, and transparent manner, and in the public domain. Indeed, the Public Prosecution announced at the time the issuance of final judgments against those accused of killing the journalist, affecting 8 convicted persons, and acquired final status according to Article (210) of the Criminal Procedure Law.

Prison sentences
And the spokesman announced to the Public Prosecution that these provisions – according to their wording after the termination of the right of legal assignment to the relatives of the deceased – stipulate imprisonment for periods totaling 124 years. The sentences imposed 20 years in prison for 5 of the convicted persons against each of them, and 3 of those convicted with sentences of ten years for one of them, and 7 years for two of them. These provisions became final and enforceable according to Article (212) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

These rulings resulted in the healing of the immense citizens and non-citizens around the world, who expressed their dissatisfaction with the killing of Khashoggi in this ugly way, and saw that Saudi Arabia triumphed for the man and his family as well.

America also dealt with the perpetrators of the “Abu Ghraib” prison … this is what Saudi Arabia did in the Khashoggi incident

Previously

The Saudi leadership and people believe that the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate inside Turkey was unfortunate and painful. Because it occurred to an innocent Saudi citizen as a result of mistakes committed by individuals who made efforts on their own initiative to deal with the victim without referring to their officials. The result was his death in this painful way.

Saudi Arabia also believes that the mistake of these individuals is not exclusive to Saudi Arabia. Rather, it is a mistake that can happen by any person, at any time, and in any country, big or small, but the difference between one country and another remains the mechanism for dealing with this mistake in the appropriate way to promote the right and establish justice for all citizens without exception, even if they are From the category of opponents.

Abu Ghraib prison”
The murder of Jamal Khashoggi is very close to a similar incident that occurred in the American prison inside Iraq during the American-Iraqi war, when American officers committed excesses inside this prison, which resulted in the death of a number of Iraqis, and they tortured them in brutal and degrading methods. This act was an individual act of those guilty of torture, which American officials did not know, not even the American president at the time (George Bush Jr.), but when the press brought these transgressions to American officials, they made their decision to bring the guilty to trial, and judgments were issued that helped calm world public opinion The angry, and this is exactly what Saudi leaders did in the Khashoggi incident. When the investigations proved that Khashoggi’s killing occurred as a result of the mistakes of some individuals, the rulers of the matter did not want this incident to pass without deterrent punishment for the real culprits. Saudi Arabia voluntarily brought these people to trial to obtain their punishment, in a public, frank, and transparent manner, and in the public domain. Indeed, the Public Prosecution announced at the time the issuance of final judgments against those accused of killing the journalist, affecting 8 convicted persons, and acquired final status according to Article (210) of the Criminal Procedure Law.

Prison sentences
And the spokesman announced to the Public Prosecution that these provisions – according to their wording after the termination of the right of legal assignment to the relatives of the deceased – stipulate imprisonment for periods totaling 124 years. The sentences imposed 20 years in prison for 5 of the convicted persons against each of them, and 3 of those convicted with sentences of ten years for one of them, and 7 years for two of them. These provisions became final and enforceable according to Article (212) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

These rulings resulted in the healing of the immense citizens and non-citizens around the world, who expressed their dissatisfaction with the killing of Khashoggi in this ugly way, and saw that Saudi Arabia triumphed for the man and his family as well.

February 27, 2021 – Rajab 15, 1442

02:08 AM

Last update
February 27, 2021 – Rajab 15, 1442

06:15 AM


His death annoyed the leadership, so it dealt with him fairly and quickly

The Saudi leadership and people believe that the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate inside Turkey was unfortunate and painful. Because it occurred to an innocent Saudi citizen as a result of mistakes committed by individuals who made efforts on their own initiative to deal with the victim without referring to their officials. The result was his death in this painful way.

Saudi Arabia also believes that the mistake of these individuals is not exclusive to Saudi Arabia. Rather, it is a mistake that can happen by any person, at any time, and in any country, big or small, but the difference between one country and another remains the mechanism for dealing with this mistake in the appropriate way to promote the right and establish justice for all citizens without exception, even if they are From the category of opponents.

Abu Ghraib prison”
The murder of Jamal Khashoggi is very close to a similar incident that occurred in the American prison inside Iraq during the American-Iraqi war, when American officers committed excesses inside this prison, which resulted in the death of a number of Iraqis, and they tortured them in brutal and degrading methods. This act was an individual act of those guilty of torture, which American officials did not know, not even the American president at the time (George Bush Jr.), but when the press brought these transgressions to American officials, they made their decision to bring the guilty to trial, and judgments were issued that helped calm world public opinion The angry, and this is exactly what Saudi leaders did in the Khashoggi incident. When the investigations proved that Khashoggi’s killing occurred as a result of the mistakes of some individuals, the rulers of the matter did not want this incident to pass without deterrent punishment for the real culprits. Saudi Arabia voluntarily brought these people to trial to obtain their punishment, in a public, frank, and transparent manner, and in the public domain. Indeed, the Public Prosecution announced at the time the issuance of final judgments against those accused of killing the journalist, affecting 8 convicted persons, and acquired final status according to Article (210) of the Criminal Procedure Law.

Prison sentences
And the spokesman announced to the Public Prosecution that these provisions – according to their wording after the termination of the right of legal assignment to the relatives of the deceased – stipulate imprisonment for periods totaling 124 years. The sentences imposed 20 years in prison for 5 of the convicted persons against each of them, and 3 of those convicted with sentences of ten years for one of them, and 7 years for two of them. These provisions became final and enforceable according to Article (212) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

These rulings resulted in the healing of the immense citizens and non-citizens around the world, who expressed their dissatisfaction with the killing of Khashoggi in this ugly way, and saw that Saudi Arabia triumphed for the man and his family as well.





LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here