The Supreme Judicial Council in Lebanon passed the examination of formations and judicial transfers after two months of continuous sessions, so it ended midnight on Wednesday from finalizing them within the framework of a draft decree, which he referred to the Minister of Justice Marie Claude Najm for his signature, to be also appended by the signatures of the Ministers of Defense and Finance Zeina Akkar, Ghazni Zani and the President The government, Hassan Diab, then informs his last stop with the signature of President Michel Aoun.
The new formations delighted judges who were appointed to important and sensitive locations and aroused the resentment of others who were transferred from their positions either by disciplinary or by virtue of rotation, which led some of them to submit his resignation or waving it, and others to submit a request to “deposit”, that is, allow them to travel temporarily to countries Others, but this negative reality was not confined to the judges, but rather reached political references, and Al-Sharq Al-Awsat learned that the final form of the formations disturbed the President and his political team, as it excluded all the judges who are close to Aoun or most of them from sensitive centers, who were appointed to them before Three years, during which formations he was ar Former Justice Minister Salim Jreissati called her.
Pending the release of the formations, he learned that they included about 300 judges, out of 560 judges, and judicial sources revealed to «Middle east“The transfers that take place at the level of investigating judges, public defenders, and courts of first instance and appeals appear to be normal and routine,” noting that they “affected a number of important and essential centers, most notably the locations of prosecutors in four governorates, the military prosecutor, and the first investigative judges, which are:
Judge Raja Hammouche appointed an appellate public prosecutor in Beirut, to replace Judge Ziad Bou Haidar, who was transferred to the status of the first investigative judge in Mount Lebanon.
Judge Samer Lishaa is an appellate public prosecutor in Mount Lebanon, in the place of Judge Ghada Aoun, who was transferred to a secondary center, and is an advisor to the Criminal Court of Cassation.
Judge Rania Yahfoufi, Prosecutor General of the South, replaced Judge Raheef Ramadan, who appointed an investigative judge to the Military Court. Judge Najat Abu Shaqra, a public prosecutor in Nabatiyeh, replaces Judge Ghada Abu Alwan, who was appointed to the position of the first military investigative judge.
Judge Claude Karam, Government Commissioner to the Military Court (Military Prosecutor), replaced Judge Peter Germanus, who was attached to the Ministry of Justice.
Judge Rabei al-Hussami: A first investigative judge in Beirut, succeeding Judge Ghassan Aouidat, who became a discriminatory public prosecutor (the public prosecutor) by decision of the government late last summer.
Judge Johnny Azzi, the first investigative judge in northern Lebanon, replaced Judge Samaranda Nassar, and the latter was reportedly transferred as an advisor to the Civil Court of Cassation.
Judge Ayman Awaidat, the first president of the courts of appeal in the south, replaced Judge Rola Jadayel, who was previously appointed as Director-General of the Ministry of Justice.
Judge Randa Kfoury, president of the sixth chamber of the Criminal Court of Cassation, to succeed Judge Joseph Samaha, who was referred to retirement.
Sources and accompanying the formations revealed to Asharq Al-Awsat that it “aroused widespread dissatisfaction with the President of the Republic and his political team, and the Free Patriotic Movement, as it was the one that targeted the judges most closely affiliated with the President, most notably the judges: Ghada Aoun, Peter Germanos, Nicola Mansour, Samaranda Nassar and Roland They bought me and others, ”noting that this team“ attributes the removal of these judges for political reasons, especially Judge Aoun, who previously filed a lawsuit against former Prime Minister Najib Mikati and members of his family with “illegal enrichment,” and it also raised a problem with Representative Hadi Habish. The day after her decision to arrest his cousin, Hoda Salloum, it was presumed There is no interest in registering cars and vehicles, ”noting that the Shiite judges affiliated with Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri and the Druze, who are affiliated with the head of the Progressive Socialist Party, Walid Jumblatt, did not harm them, but their positions were strengthened and protected.
At this time, a prominent judicial source confirmed to Asharq Al-Awsat that the formations “adopted the principle of competence and integrity, as the principle of reward and punishment, and relied on the file of each judge.” He stressed that «from the first day to start examining the formations, Judge Council Judge Suhail Aboud cut the lines of communication with all political references, and warned all judges not to resort to politicians to seek intercession here or a position there», pointing out that there are judges who are known for their integrity and dedication At work, they were previously not fortunate to hold any position, because they are not affiliated with influential parties or politicians, and now they have been fair in these formations, which are the main entrance to restore citizens ’confidence in the judiciary.”
There are conflicting information about the possibility of signing the decree of formations by the President of the Republic, and sources concerned with this file have explained to “Asharq Al-Awsat” that “the failure to sign the decree embarrasses President Aoun, who pledged to protect the judiciary and release his hand in accountability and self-purification, to be trustworthy when starting the trial of corrupt” .
In turn, sources in the Supreme Judicial Council confirmed to «News“They” excluded the judges who had a repulsive political affiliation. The matter was not confined to the Free Patriotic Movement, but rather involved judges who have a party affiliation with both the Future Movement and the Amal Movement. The sources believe that “the formations were portrayed as if they overthrew the judges of the Covenant, but the fact is that the coincidences wished that some of the majority of those who were transferred should have suspicions.” Judges contesting the formations also take into account that they have not taken into account the criteria that have been established, particularly in terms of respecting grades or seniority. More than one judge told “Al-Akhbar” that “suspicious colleagues” were left behind. One of the sources adds that “one of the prosecutors lied about the number of files he had with the aim of sending the Supreme Judicial Council more judges to help him, he was not held accountable.” He also says, “There are centers to which privileged judges have been transferred, while there are judges who are well-known for their competitors and left in marginal centers. And here comes the mention of a single judge who has been in her position for four years, but the lowest of whom was appointed to a more important position. However, the higher judiciary sources confirm that “the degree was a last criterion in the list, so that reputation, productivity and a dynamic personality were presented.”