Source: Houston – France Press
The Dean of the University of “Texas A&M” wrote an open letter to the president of the ancient Harvard University, Lawrence Pico complaining of statements by Harvard professors accusing the study’s authors of not having revealed their links to a university program funded partly by the pressure group for the beef production sector.
In turn, John Sharp wrote, “I can assure you that the study of Texas A&M University is based on purely scientific grounds and a point on the line,” accusing Harvard researchers of “immoral” work.
This study is the summary of several previous studies on the effect of consuming red and cured meats on CVD and cancer.
It also concluded that the increased risks from consuming these products are so weak that they cannot be used as a justification for the recommendations issued by public health agencies that it is necessary to reduce the consumption of red and cured meats, a conclusion that raised a whirlwind of responses.
A few weeks after the results of the study were published last October, it became clear that the principal author of this abstract is Bradley Johnston, a professor at Dalhousie University in Canada and a researcher at the “NutriTex” group that completed the study, previously received funding from the University of Texas A program And mother. ”
And the magazine that published the study, which is “Annals of Internal Medicine,” considered that the authors of the study should have disclosed their financial links based on the principle of transparency. An updated version of the study was published on December 31 to publicly announce these links.
Likewise, The New York Times reported that Bradley Johnston had in the past received funding from the Elsie Organization, which is funded by the food industry, in a study whose results questioned the validity of recommendations to reduce sugar consumption.